|
Post by SeriousJupiter on Mar 5, 2009 2:13:13 GMT -6
I got only 58 points? Oh well. I'll do better next time. And by better, I mean worse.
|
|
|
Post by panda on Mar 5, 2009 2:32:23 GMT -6
Well, Do the mumbers get added up afterwards?
Yay, thanks, lukas.
|
|
|
Post by SeriousJupiter on Mar 5, 2009 5:22:44 GMT -6
Now Lukas has rated the comics, who's next?
|
|
|
Post by lukaskirkby on Mar 5, 2009 12:15:50 GMT -6
The numbers should be averaged, and then averaged with the votes. I think.
|
|
Net
Expert Trainer
Posts: 699
|
Post by Net on Mar 5, 2009 14:10:08 GMT -6
some of My comments on lukas's ratings.Ok, lets start off with Panda. You used a good selection of typos, rubbish effects, and horrible site resizes. The panels overlapped, the bitmixing was awful, and the colours made my eyes bleed. I'll give this a 68/100 for truly awfulness. Sad that panda is last or 2nd last (not sure of which)Next, Abiesra. The comic was too big alltogether, the typos were awful, stretched sprites, crappy colours, and even random squiggles across the page. But the two things that were truly atrocious about this page was firstly, the arrows that pointed to the sequence of the comic, and secondly, the awfully drawn pikachu that looked like it had something up its bum. I'm going to give this 74/100. My impression on this entry when i first seen it: Thirdly, Shadane. What an awful page! Horrible background, hand drawn panels, arrows showing the order of the panels, terrible order of the panels, sprites still with their backgrounds, distorted sprites, reshaped sprites, truly atrocious battle effects, a lackluster storyline and a horrible use of the paint spray paint. I'll give this a rubbish 87/100 thanks for the 87/100 (4.4 on a 10 scale)Fourth, Chaoman45. Well, I didn't have a clue what was going on, so that's a start. Too much red is bad for the eyes, and the storyline was cliche. There were multiple typos, and a badly copied sound effect from Pokemon X. I think it was the fact that the backgrounds(when there was any) really were awful that gives you a 70/100. yeah i went to the eye doctor for all the red (as Lukas said, bad for the eyes)Fifth, Seriousjupiter. Compared to the others, this wasn't as bad a page. I mean, the panels didn't look that bad and most of the sprites weren't resized or distorted. But, there were some rookie aspects to this. It was all in chatspeak, the water, grass, and ice effects left MUCH to be desired, half the speech is in bubbles, and half of it isn't, and there are 'lol's and 'zomg's mingling with the panels. But, as I said, it wasn't as awful as the others, so I'll have to give to 58/100. This one isn't really bad, i found this one a little....good, the panels look like a rookies comicmaaker's first day. and the sprites weren't altered in any way (the backround things were removed from the sprite sheets)Sixth, Abizaroo. The first thing that jumps out at me are the horrific borders. And the fact that it says 'first gen v third gen' already bodes badly for the rest of the comic, which indeed it was. This is why you don't bitmix, folks! The panels differed in size, and the whole thing was as distorted as who knows what. The pencil written comments around the comic are the worst I have ever seen, and the edited battle texts really are bordering on hellacious. The psychic interlude is pointless, the front pose of Gary gives me a headache, and I'm going to have to give you a 90/100 for crappyness. At least im second -_- (only behind 3 points)Seventh, Gooman. Well, you didn't make enough panels to insert more crappyness into this page, but I think what you have here is pretty bad. The hand written speak, the smiley face, and the numbers panels are not nice to look at. But, for lack of it, I'll have to only give you a 42/100. funny, but that probaly took 5 minutes at the most
|
|
|
Post by cbiesra on Mar 5, 2009 14:35:26 GMT -6
Awesome, I got a pretty good score. And yeah, that was teh effect I was going for. (Of course ) Abizarro definatly deserved the best score here. No complaints from me.
|
|
|
Post by Gooman on Mar 5, 2009 16:17:45 GMT -6
funny, but that probaly took 5 minutes at the most actually, it took me 30 minutes to get the sprites onto paint (my computer loader spriters-reference REALLY slowly), and it took me 15 minutes to get all the effects the way i wanted them.
|
|
|
Post by panda on Mar 5, 2009 23:33:41 GMT -6
Oh, well.
just goes to show slow computers are crap computers.
|
|
|
Post by Emily Pink on Mar 5, 2009 23:37:34 GMT -6
My Dell finds that statement offensive!! But my iBook finds it hilarious..... >_>
|
|
|
Post by abizarro on Mar 6, 2009 3:33:14 GMT -6
My acer is crying in the corner and self harming. My logitech keyboard is trying to help but its making it worse (wireless and all that).
Woop! 90. I wonder what would have got 100? Would i have had to print out the sprites, cut them out with scissors, glue them onto a page, upload them to a windows 98 computer and email you the computer? (yes you can email computers, its just a matter of the right format)
|
|
|
Post by joshdaniels on Mar 6, 2009 16:14:37 GMT -6
*Throws up after seeing all* Wow if I was a judge I would accidentally give them all 0
|
|
|
Post by SeriousJupiter on Mar 7, 2009 13:33:05 GMT -6
But that would mean they were good.
|
|
|
Post by panda on Mar 7, 2009 20:25:53 GMT -6
0 being bad, 5 being good.
|
|
|
Post by SeriousJupiter on Mar 8, 2009 6:47:31 GMT -6
Oh, right...
|
|
|
Post by abizarro on Mar 8, 2009 9:27:44 GMT -6
but i think i remember shadane saying bad was good.
this may get quite complicated.
|
|